[Alt-photo] RocklandLiquid light
chansonette at gmail.com
Thu Aug 31 18:04:24 UTC 2017
I have found that the Ag + is worth the slightly higher cost due to better silver content. I've used it on a variety of surfaces from fabric to tintype. It does fog easily, but as long as your student is prepared and takes precautions they should be fine. Lots of fun to play with!
Sent from my iPhone
> On Aug 31, 2017, at 11:53 AM, Jorj Bauer via Alt-photo-process-list <alt-photo-process-list at lists.altphotolist.org> wrote:
> I use Rockland LL for dry plate tintypes. Ag+ dogs too easily for me, but LL is quite forgiving.
> Not sure about paper, though...
> Sent from my iPhone
>> On Aug 31, 2017, at 11:37, Karen Hymer via Alt-photo-process-list <alt-photo-process-list at lists.altphotolist.org> wrote:
>> I have a student interested in using Liquid light on paper - not sure if Rockland or Foma Fomaspeed. We have read the section in James book. I have not used it since the 80’s. When I used it I was printing mural size and had trouble with fogging due to long exposures, even in the dark. It does sound like the AG -Plus is better or possibly the Foma. Does anyone have recent experience and if so, can you offer some tips and brand or paper choices? The student will not be working large - probably 8x10 range.
>> Any help would be appreciated.
>> karenhymer at gmail.com
>> Alt-photo-process-list | altphotolist.org
> Alt-photo-process-list | altphotolist.org
More information about the Alt-photo-process-list