[Alt-photo] Digital and Alt printing

Darkrooms, Department of Art darkroommanager at cornell.edu
Wed Jul 5 20:31:27 UTC 2017


Hi Bob,

Im not sure if you are asking about the difference between alt prints and inkjet prints or alt prints made from digital negs and alt prints from analog negatives. As for the latter… I make tricolor gum prints from digital captured files and from scanned film both being made into digital negatives. Honestly, I cannot tell the difference between what was derived from film and what was digital capture.  That said I have not made a gum print directly from analog film. 

Best,
Jennifer Gioffre
Tjaden Hall Teaching Support Specialist
College of Architecture Art and Planning
Cornell University
102a Tjaden Hall 
Ithaca, NY 14853
 
t.  607-255-4207
f.  607-255-3462
Jmg393 at cornell.edu
Darkroommanager at cornell.edu
AAPstore at cornell.edu

On 7/5/17, 1:41 PM, "Alt-photo-process-list on behalf of bobkiss caribsurf.com via Alt-photo-process-list" <alt-photo-process-list-bounces at lists.altphotolist.org on behalf of alt-photo-process-list at lists.altphotolist.org> wrote:

    DEAR ROBERT, 
    
    From my perspective there are a few physical and aesthetic differences between digital printing and alt photo printing that are quite obvious. 
    
    1) In most alt processes (except albumen, POP and, perhaps a few others) there is no "undercoating" (used to be baryta in silver gelatin paper) between the paper and the sensitizer where as most digital papers (and the vast majority of silver gelatin papers) have this undercoating. The undercoating, in addition to many other things, yields finer detail in the finished print whereas, its absence allows the texture of the paper surface/fibers to be visible in all tones and areas of the alt print because the sensitizer soaks, at least partially, into the paper. I love the aesthetic effect of this and it does also gently soften finer details. 
    
    2) There is a significant difference between an image made with digital inkjet pigments laid down on the above mentioned undercoating and receiver layer and prints made with gum (very textured) and pt/pd (slightly textured). 
    
    Much more to be said but I am about to go into a meeting... 
    
    CHEERS! 
    BOB 
    
    
    
    From: "alt-photo-process-list at lists.altphotolist.org" <alt-photo-process-list at lists.altphotolist.org> 
    To: "alt-photo-process-list at lists.altphotolist.org" <alt-photo-process-list at lists.altphotolist.org> 
    Sent: Wednesday, July 5, 2017 1:05:24 PM 
    Subject: [Alt-photo] Digital and Alt printing 
    
    Hi, 
    Somewhat of a vague question I suppose. 
    I don't really care for the super sharp super clean look of straight digital images. Too much of a recording for my tastes. 
    My question is about how an image made with a digital camera translates into a Gum print or a Platinum print. 
    Does a Gum print do away with the "digital" look? Would a platimun print, by its nature being less manipulated then a Gum still accomplish this? 
    
    I doubt I've articulated this very well but maybe you get the idea. 
    
    Thanks, 
    
    Robert 
    _______________________________________________ 
    Alt-photo-process-list | altphotolist.org 
    _______________________________________________
    Alt-photo-process-list | altphotolist.org
    



More information about the Alt-photo-process-list mailing list