[Alt-photo] Alt-photo-process-list Digest, Vol 176, Issue 7

Seth Martin graflex at gmail.com
Sun Oct 8 13:43:21 UTC 2017


Well the method I use might work for Carbon. I'am using an RC base paper
made for inkjet printing. The negatives I make are made primarily for
printing on silver gelatin print paper. The results are indistinguishable
from traditional gelatin prints. Of course silver gelatin paper is fast
(15-20 seconds ) in comparison to the Carbon process, However, I've been
making Gum prints with these paper negatives and the exposures are 5-10
mins in the sun using Amon. Dichromate as my sensitizer. Perhaps the times
will be similar for Carbon since the sensitizer is the the same.

On Sun, Oct 8, 2017 at 8:41 AM, mineurdecharbon <mineurdecharbon at skynet.be>
wrote:

> Carbon
> Negative Software Bulldog
> Perfect Printing Negative for Carbon and Carbon Three Color
>
>
>
> Envoyé depuis mon smartphone Samsung Galaxy.
>
> -------- Message d'origine --------
> De : Seth Martin via Alt-photo-process-list <alt-photo-process-list at lists.
> altphotolist.org>
> Date : 8/10/17 14:35 (GMT+01:00)
> À : alt-photo-process-list at lists.altphotolist.org
> Objet : Re: [Alt-photo] Alt-photo-process-list Digest, Vol 176, Issue 7
>
> I may have an answer, but first...What process are you using Pictorico
> Ultra Premium for?
>
> Seth Martin
>
> On Sun, Oct 8, 2017 at 8:00 AM, <
> alt-photo-process-list-request at lists.altphotolist.org> wrote:
>
> > Send Alt-photo-process-list mailing list submissions to
> >         alt-photo-process-list at lists.altphotolist.org
> >
> > To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
> >         https://mailman-mail5.webfaction.com/listinfo/alt-
> > photo-process-list
> > or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
> >         alt-photo-process-list-request at lists.altphotolist.org
> >
> > You can reach the person managing the list at
> >         alt-photo-process-list-owner at lists.altphotolist.org
> >
> > When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> > than "Re: Contents of Alt-photo-process-list digest..."
> >
> >
> > Today's Topics:
> >
> >    1. Re:  need an alternative to Pictorico Ultra Premium
> >       (`Richard Knoppow)
> >
> >
> > ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> >
> > Message: 1
> > Date: Sat, 7 Oct 2017 16:09:57 -0700
> > From: `Richard Knoppow <dickburk at ix.netcom.com>
> > To: alt-photo-process-list at lists.altphotolist.org
> > Subject: Re: [Alt-photo] need an alternative to Pictorico Ultra
> >         Premium
> > Message-ID: <8c931141-01cb-b51c-075d-43b2c0bcb717 at ix.netcom.com>
> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed
> >
> >  ?? Your message is on the list so you did the right thing.
> >
> > On 10/7/2017 3:52 PM, John Isner via Alt-photo-process-list wrote:
> > >
> > > I realize I am replying to your personal email address.  How should I
> > reply
> > > in such a way that my reply appears on the listserv?
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > John
> > >
> > > FYI I am not the tennis player!
> > >
> > > On Sat, Oct 7, 2017 at 2:38 PM, Keith Schreiber <keith at jkschreiber.com
> >
> > > wrote:
> > >
> >
> > --
> > Richard Knoppow
> > dickburk at ix.netcom.com
> > WB6KBL
> >
> >
> >
> > ------------------------------
> >
> > Subject: Digest Footer
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Alt-photo-process-list | altphotolist.org
> >
> >
> > ------------------------------
> >
> > End of Alt-photo-process-list Digest, Vol 176, Issue 7
> > ******************************************************
> >
> _______________________________________________
> Alt-photo-process-list | altphotolist.org
>


More information about the Alt-photo-process-list mailing list