[Alt-photo] ziatype question

Robert Krawiec robk64 at yahoo.com
Mon Jan 29 21:34:46 UTC 2018

Hi Bob,
I've dabbled a little with ziatypes. I like the concept, but I've only rarely been able to get a really good dmax out of this process. 

I initially used some Polaroid 55 negatives to play around and decided that I liked the gold chloride with sodium tungsten effect (a nice brown-blue split), so I tailored my digital negatives to this mix. Ziatype is pretty tolerant so you can use other mixes and still get a decent print out, then use some of the other chemistry to bump or reduce contrast. Last resort for me is creating a new curve for my digital negs (I use piezography inks, for me the simplest method out there).
Good luck!

    On Saturday, January 27, 2018 9:37 AM, Bob Cornelis via Alt-photo-process-list <alt-photo-process-list at lists.altphotolist.org> wrote:

 Hi Group!

I'm about to embark on some initial ziatype testing and am curious about
something I have not seen addressed in the materials I have.

Since Ziatype allows for modifications to tone and contrast with the use of
different chemicals (replacing the palladium component with things like
gold chloride, sodium tungsten, etc), to what degree will this change
exposure times and/or custom curves created?

It would seem impractical to have to start over with calibration every time
you tweak a few drops of chemistry here or there, but it also seems that
particularly if you are affecting contract at least new custom curve might
be needed.

Any practical advice about how to approach this? CJames has a nice chart
showing a number of chem combinations and their affect on tone and
contrast. Would it make sense to only recalibrate if you are adjusting
contrast? Would a new curve be sufficient or is a new exposure time needed

Alt-photo-process-list | altphotolist.org


More information about the Alt-photo-process-list mailing list