[Alt-photo] Antwort: Re: Antwort: Re: Dichromates and Septic System?
john at johnbrewerphotography.com
Thu Mar 29 15:24:33 UTC 2018
I would give them a phone call. Maybe you can find it here?
On 29 March 2018 at 16:08, Victor Malakhov via Alt-photo-process-list <
alt-photo-process-list at lists.altphotolist.org> wrote:
> can you please provide the link to the REACH regulation referring to
> usage of the bichromates in commercial business? I am located in
> Germany and have a one person business in digital photography. Now I
> consider to transfer at least one part of my alternative processes to
> commercial basis too. But after your conversation I am wondering, if
> it is a clever idea at all. Are there other relevant chemicals
> (like from Wetplate, Cyanotype etc.) affected by REACH so hard too?
> best wishes,
> > Sorry my mistake....this statement is true for Germany only....
> > because here REACH is only mandatory for companies and commercial
> > business (even if you are a one person business). I have no clue how it
> is in other countries.
> > Udo
> > -----johnbrewerphotography at gmail.com schrieb: -----
> > An: udo.schnitzbauer at uzh.ch,
> > alt-photo-process-list at lists.altphotolist.org
> > Von: johnbrewerphotography at gmail.com
> > Datum: 20.02.2018 15:40
> > Betreff: Re: [Alt-photo] Antwort: Re: Dichromates and Septic System?
> > ‘but only if you do it commercial (professional) (in German:
> > gewerblich) because REACH counts not for private (= hobby) use.’
> > ———————
> > It’s much more complicated than that. If a license wasn’t applied
> > for and granted before the ‘sunset‘ date you are not allowed to
> > possess or use hexavelant chromium salts. I’m not sure you can even
> > apply now. The form was extremely complicated to fill out and
> > ideally would need the advice of an expert.
> > I spoke to REACH prior to the ban. I was advised that if a business
> > used small amounts, (under one tonne a year!), for research then no
> > license ‘probably‘ wouldn’t be needed but but detailed notes are
> > necessary to prove research is being carried out. I have this in
> > writing. This is how I’m approaching the issue.
> > Best wishes from the UK
> > John
> > Sent from my iPhone
> >> On 20 Feb 2018, at 07:16, BJ68 via Alt-photo-process-list <
> alt-photo-process-list at lists.altphotolist.org> wrote:
> >> but only if you do it commercial (professional) (in German: gewerblich)
> because REACH counts not for private (= hobby) use.
> > _______________________________________________
> > Alt-photo-process-list | altphotolist.org
> Victor Malakhov
> VIC TOR PHOTOGRAPHY
> info at vic-tor-photoraphy.de
> Alt-photo-process-list | altphotolist.org
workshops:equipment sales:chemistry sales
More information about the Alt-photo-process-list