[Ok-sus] my exchange with Senator Inhofe
ewpollard at gmail.com
Wed Mar 13 19:55:44 UTC 2013
As a co-moderator of the listserv it is my responsibility to monitor posts
and ensure they comply with Oklahoma Sustainability Network (OSN) Listserv
Political discussions bring out passion and emotions for many of us, but I
want to ensure that posts are an extension of OSN's mission which is to
connect and educate the people of Oklahoma concerning the many aspects of
Thank you to everyone that is part of the discussion here! Happy posting.
*OSN Listserv Guidelines*
The purpose of the OSN listserv is thoughtful, engaging networking and
sharing of information. Discussion and posts should be relevant to listserv
purposes – an extension of OSN’s sustainable mission: The Oklahoma
Sustainability Network (OSN) serves to connect and educate the people of
Oklahoma concerning the many aspects of sustainability. OSN is a catalyst
and a resource for the improvement of Oklahoma's economy, ecology, and
● The listserv is designed to encourage widespread interaction among a
statewide and regional community made up of users with varying levels of
expertise and knowledge.
● Views expressed by those posting on the listserv and those replying
do not necessarily reflect the opinions or positions of the Oklahoma
Sustainability Network board or members.
*How to post*
Brand new subject:
● Compose an email
● In the “to” line enter the listserv email address,
ok-sus at lists.oksustainability.org
If replying to a post:
● Click on “reply,” write your response, click “send.”
● If you are replying to and building on a previous email, please note
new direction of the discussion in the subject line.
*How to manage your subscription*
The OSN listserv is user-friendly and gives members control over their own
subscription options. To manage your subscription or unsubscribe, go to
Quick posting tips
● In general, keep messages concise and to the point. Shorter posts
are more likely to be read.
Be mindful of quality and how often you post
● Be mindful of what you post and consider how it contributes the
● Found a cache of good articles? Please post them over a period of
several days rather than all at once. Sending too many articles at once
overwhelms people with information and can discourage reading of valuable
Value and relevance
● Post an article, commentary or reply related to sustainability
● When responding, don't add personal notes such as “me too,” “thank
you,” etc. These types of responses should be sent off-list directly to the
original person who sent the original email.
● Use the listserv to invite discussion rather than as a bully pulpit.
Such posts may be rejected.
Use meaningful ‘subject’ lines
● In starting a new discussion topic, use a meaningful 'Subject' line.
Many people decide whether they want to read a listserv message based on
the subject line.
● If a discussion thread has gone on for a series of several replies
and responses, you may delete all but *the *most recent response and your
reply. Since all posts are archived if someone wants to read an entire
email thread, they can do so online at the OSN Web site.
● If you need help, don't write “Help me,” in the subject line.
Instead indicate the specific type of problem for which you're seeking
Listserv guidelines By subscribing to the OSN, you agree to the following
guidelines: When posting articles, respect copyright
● Please respect copyright standards of a publication.
● *Unless you have permission from the author and/or publication
posting a full copy or large swaths of a newspaper or magazine article is
not acceptable and is a violation of a publication’s and/or author’s
● In general it is acceptable to post *brief* "fair use" excerpts of
such articles – usually a *few* highlights from the article -- along with a
link to the full article. For more info on "fair use" click
here<http://www.copyright.gov/fls/fl102.html>to read what the U.S.
Copyright Office has to say regarding Fair Use.
● Always be sure to credit the author and publication in your post and
provide the URL (link to story) if available.
● *Notify listserv members if the full article is not available online
due to subscription requirements or other issues.*
● If you wish to post the full article and are unsure about the
copyright standards of a publication, please contact the publication
directly and obtain permission to reprint before you post.
● If you obtain permission to reprint an article in full, then that
state this clearly when posting the article.
● *Posts that do not follow these guidelines may be discarded without
● Consistent violations may result in cancellation of listserv
● Example of how to post:
*Take exchange of personal information off-list*
When exchanging information that is not germane to the entire group, such
as making arrangements to meet another member, reconnecting with a friend
or colleague, checking on status of projects you may be working on with
another listserv member, asking someone to send you an attachment in a
different format, or similar situations, please respond to the person
off-list rather than posting the info to the entire group.
No commercials ● Do not post commercial messages or ads. ● If
someone poses a query or asks for services or information and you sell a
product you feel they might be interested in, please send your detailed
reply privately to the original sender rather than post it to the listserv.
● Posting a brief mention of a product or service that is in direct
response to a legitimate request from another participant is acceptable;
just refer the person directly to the source for more information. Be
● Civil, open, respectful discussion is encouraged.
● Each participant is accountable for his or her own messages.
● Please be thoughtful when commenting.
● Remember intended tone of voice can easily be lost in written
communication; if you want something to be understood in a certain way
(humor, sarcasm, etc), it may help to provide an obvious indicator of tone
to avoid misinterpretation.
● Do not belittle others in your posts. It discourages and intimidates
members from participating, and diminishes the value of the listserv for
● No flames or personal attacks (flames are adversarial posts meant to
defame, hurt or rebuke in a manner which is offensive or inflammatory).
Such posts will be rejected.
● Failure to grasp the sender's tone is a common cause of angry
replies, or "flames.”
● You agree not to post abusive, obscene, vulgar, slanderous, libelous,
defamatory, hateful, threatening, sexually-oriented or any other material
that may violate any applicable laws. Doing so may lead to you being
immediately and permanently banned (and your service provider being
informed). The IP address of all posts is recorded to aid in enforcing
● Avoid rants -- writing in an angry or violent manner; to rave; to
utter or express with violence or extravagance; i.e. a dictator who ranted
his vitriol onto a captive audience.
● Avoid bullying -- blustering, quarrelsome, overbearing, habitually
badgering and intimidating, arrogant and domineering, adversarial language.
● A firm no-SPAM policy is in effect -- and is strictly enforced by the
moderators. Violators will be banned.
● You agree that the webmaster, administrator and moderators of this
forum have the right to remove, edit, move or close any topic or post at
any time should they see fit.
● As a user you agree to any information you have entered above being
stored in a database. While this information will not be disclosed to any
third party without your consent, the webmaster, administrator and
moderators cannot be held responsible for any hacking attempt that may lead
to the data being compromised.
● OSN cannot verify the content of postings for accuracy. Parties
submitting messages to the listserv bear sole responsibility and liability
for the content of their postings. However, if a message violates any of
the inappropriate submissions guidelines listed herein, then the offender’s
post may be returned for editing or discarded without notice. Consistent
violations may result in cancellation of listserv privileges.
On Wed, Mar 13, 2013 at 2:06 PM, Bob Moore - Biodiesel <
bobmoorebiodiesel at yahoo.com> wrote:
> I have been involved with Green Energy for many years. I have been a
> member of the Oklahoma Renewable Energy Council for years, I am involved
> with Biodiesel and with SIPS Housing.
> I find it odd that some people are so upset with Senator Jim Inhofe who is
> 100% correct about global warming. Wish these people were as upset with
> all the lies from Obama.
> I can show you global warming --- when a farmer plows a field - the temp
> goes up in the earth and in the air but that does not mean is it bad. How
> many bombs was explored in World War II yet the earth recovered . Global
> Warming people believe they are smarter than GOD and it is up to you to
> solve the world problems.
> The Federal Government should be involved with global warmer issues at all.
> Bob Moore
> Bob Moore Biodiesel - Bob Moore Commercial Financing - phone 580-695-0331-
> www.biodieselok.webs.com - email bobmoorebiodiesel at yahoo.com
> *From:* Vicke Adams <vicke at vickeadams.com>
> *To:* ok-sus at lists.oksustainability.org
> *Sent:* Tuesday, March 12, 2013 7:18 PM
> *Subject:* [Ok-sus] my exchange with Senator Inhofe
> I am fuming. I got the e-mail you will find below from Senator Inhofe when
> I wrote regarding his position on global warming. My reply e-mail is also
> below. I know that it doesn’t do any good to argue with him on this subject
> as he wrote a whole book of bullsh**t on the subject. However, I just can’t
> stand it that he thinks he can throw out these lies to his constituents and
> get away with it. Does he think we are all stupid? I guess if they keep
> reducing education funding maybe they will get a generation that is stupid
> enough to accept his phony baloney.
> I wish everyone would write to him and give him the facts of which he
> seems to be ignorant. Maybe, at least he would begin to figure out that
> there are people in Oklahoma who cannot be duped by him and others like him
> with their hands in the pockets of oil and gas.
> Ugh… thanks for letting me vent.
> *From:* Vicke Adams [mailto:vicke at vickeadams.com]
> *Sent:* Tuesday, March 12, 2013 7:06 PM
> *To:* 'Jim_Inhofe at inhofe.senate.gov'
> *Subject:* RE: Responding to your message
> Dear Senator Inhofe,
> The “leak” by blogger Alec Rawls took one sentence from a large IPCC
> report and used it out of context to try to support his uneducated view of
> climate change. In fact, there was no manipulation of data by scientists as
> you claim. No credible, science-educated person agrees with that view. Michael
> Mann, a climatologist and the director of Earth System Science Center at
> Pennsylvania State University stated that solar forcing has been flat
> over the past fifty years during which we've seen the greatest amount of
> warming. He said that there was nothing in the new IPCC report that in any
> way calls that conclusion into question.
> Furthermore, former climate change skeptic and physics professor, Richard
> Muller, PhD, in a study heavily funded by Bill Gates and the Koch
> Charitable Foundation, came to the conclusion that not only is climate
> change real, it is man-made.
> Muller writes: “Three years ago I identified problems in previous climate
> studies that, in my mind, threw doubt on the very existence of global
> warming. Last year, following an intensive research effort involving a
> dozen scientists, I concluded that global warming was real and that the
> prior estimates of the rate of warming were correct. I’m now going a step
> further: Humans are almost entirely the cause.”
> The Berkeley project’s research has shown, Muller says, “that the average
> temperature of the Earth’s land has risen by two and a half degrees
> Fahrenheit over the past 250 years, including an increase of one and a half
> degrees over the most recent 50 years. Moreover, it appears likely that
> essentially all of this increase results from the human emission of
> greenhouse gases.”
> While it may be true that the United States cannot unilaterally fix the
> problem, we certainly can be leaders in the solution. Right now, thanks to
> leaders without vision, or those with too many rewards from the oil and gas
> industry, the U.S. is behind many other industrial countries in reducing
> the causes of global warming.
> As a mother and a grandmother, I recognize that much more than our
> economic well-being is a stake. The future lives of our grandchildren are
> threatened by political leaders who refuse to accept what has been proven
> by science. Please, get your facts straight and start thinking about
> helping to ensure a future for both our grandchildren.
> Vicke Adams, MSES
> Proctor, OK
> *From:* Jim_Inhofe at inhofe.senate.gov [mailto:Jim_Inhofe at inhofe.senate.gov<Jim_Inhofe at inhofe.senate.gov>]
> *Sent:* Tuesday, March 12, 2013 1:11 PM
> *To:* vicke at vickeadams.com
> *Subject:* Responding to your message
> Dear Vicke:
> Thank you for your correspondence. As your voice in Washington, I
> appreciate the opportunity to know your views on climate change.
> As a father of four and a grandfather of twelve, I am extremely concerned
> that measures to address climate change would lower the quality of life and
> economic well-being of future generations. When I became the Chairman of
> the Environment and Public Works Committee in 2003, I decided to closely
> examine the scientific evidence as to whether global warming was real,
> man-made, and potentially catastrophic, as many were asserting. I learned
> from many credible scientists, who began to contact me about the issue,
> that the science behind global warming was, in fact, not
> settled. Additional research confirmed for me that the catastrophic global
> warming hypothesis was wrong. My skepticism was further confirmed in 2009
> when leaked emails from scientists contributing to the Intergovernmental
> Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) exposed that they manipulated data
> using flawed science to arrive at their so-called consensus claims.
> Nevertheless, the Obama Administration is determined to implement global
> warming regulations that will impose the largest tax increase in American
> history, generate higher energy prices, and destroy jobs with very little
> impact on global greenhouse gases. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)
> analysis has shown that cap-and-trade would fail to reduce our dependence
> on foreign oil, something its proponents claim is central
> to cap-and-trade legislation. China has already passed the United States
> as the leading carbon dioxide emitter, and India is not far behind.
> Without matching efforts to limit these gases among developing nations,
> the United States stands to lose thousands of jobs, many of which would go
> to countries without global warming regulations. In reality, unilateral
> action would result in increased emissions globally, because efficient
> manufacturing in our country would be exported to less efficient countries
> without greenhouse gas emission restrictions. I am thus committed
> to stopping legislation that would impose financial hardships on the
> American people under the auspices of providing a solution to climate
> Thank you again for taking the time to express your concerns. If I can be
> of further assistance, please do not hesitate to contact me again.
> James M. Inhofe
> United States Senator
> Ok-sus mailing list
> Ok-sus at lists.oksustainability.org
> Ok-sus mailing list
> Ok-sus at lists.oksustainability.org
Eric W. Pollard
C: (918) 804-2011
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Ok-sus