[Ok-sus] New clean energy tariff
vicke at vickeadams.com
Tue Apr 29 14:11:33 UTC 2014
I don't know how OG&E or PSO operate since I have Ozark Electric which is a
cooperative. Ozark does not pay for electricity put back on the grid. They
also charge a minimum monthly amount of $25 regardless of how much
electricity that you use. That is how they pay for infrastructure for
minimal users. There are many summer cabins out here where I'm at. Those
people pay $25 per month, every month, even on months they don't come out to
their cabin. So, utility companies have already figured out how to provide
for their infrastructure.
But let's look at an analogy to your argument. Toll roads are built and
maintained by the people that pay to use them. There aren't different
charges based on how much you use the road. They don't charge me if I opt to
use the alternate roads for a few months. Would you give the Turnpikes the
right to charge those who don't use it since they have to build and maintain
it on an unpredictable basis?
I read somewhere that Governor Fallin's executive order implementing this
law basically guts it. I've read the executive order, twice, and I have to
admit that I don't understand what it says. If it guts the law, I'm not sure
From: Ok-sus [mailto:ok-sus-bounces at lists.oksustainability.org] On Behalf Of
Kelley C Smith
Sent: Monday, April 28, 2014 4:27 PM
To: ok-sus at lists.oksustainability.org
Subject: Re: [Ok-sus] New clean energy tariff
I'm not sure I understand the bill, and I don't want to be an apologist for
the fossil fuel industry. but, I think I should say something or at least
ask a question.
When I looked, I thought the bill was imposing a sort of tax on those who
had solar panels, etc. and who wanted to connect to the grid to sell power
and to, when necessary, buy power. That is, if there is cloud cover for a
few days, and a family's battery back-up is running low, they would want
OG&E or PSO or someone to supply them some power for a while. Also, some
people want to sell surplus power.
Asking a utility to be your back-up of last resort is asking quite a lot.
How do they plan for this? Why should they build, and maintain generation,
transmission, and distribution facilities to sell power on such an
unpredictable basis? That's the question society must answer.
Maybe I misunderstood, and I am not saying that OGE or PSO should get
whatever they want (if indeed that's what this bill does), but we have to
think about what it means to change from fossil fuel generation and how we
deal with days when the wind doesn't blow or the sun doesn't shine.
Perhaps a more equitable, and maybe more economical solution would be very
small-scale portable gasoline or diesel generators. Or, perhaps we should
look into every possible milliwatt of energy we can save and just not ask
for back-up from the grid. It is a difficult question.
On Apr 27, 2014, at 5:52 PM, Stephanie Jeffords
<buzzardroostranch at gmail.com> wrote:
This bill is a horrible infringement on our freedom and inalienable rights.
It might be advantageous to create a petition through change.org
<http://change.org/> to have this bill repealed.
The bill obviously creates a double standard and feeds the oil and gas
monopoly. If our legislators can pass this bill to assess fees on our own
solar and wind power, what else will they try to tax or make a law against,
my garden vegetables so that Monsanto can have complete control of all
Through despot bills and over taxation our legislators are destroying our
small farms and ranches, the backbone of this country.
We have legislators that are allowing the oil and gas industry to have
absolute power or control of our state government. This is despotism and is
addressed in the preamble to our
Declaration of Independence, which also states that:
"We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal,
that they are endowed by their Creator with certain inalienable rights, that
among these are life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness."
No where does it say that all corporations are created equal with
We can not have life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness, when our
legislators engage in discriminatory, self-serving and over taxation to
suppress new technology and innovations that would take us off our forced
dependency on oil and gas.
I will sign your petition!!
On Thu, Apr 24, 2014 at 8:15 PM, Vicke Adams <vicke at vickeadams.com> wrote:
Is anyone else upset about the new fees that are now going to be assessed on
Oklahomans that have solar or wind energy? This legislature is not in touch
with reality. How and why are they penalizing me for trying to be more
sustainable, not to mention to have a source of energy when the grid is
down? I am located in a very rural area. I spent over $6000 to have a small
solar power system that provides electricity to a portion of my cabin, It
allows me to keep functioning when the grid is down. Just this week the grid
was down in my area for almost four hours. No storms, no explanations. But,
now that same utility company will have the right to charge me a monthly fee
because I have solar panels on my roof!
I called my state representative and senator as well as others to ask them
not to vote for this bill. I hope others were doing the same. What I fear is
that this terrible bill was passed through both houses and signed by the
governor today in such a slick, quiet way that most people probably don't
even know it has happened. I keep waiting for the outrage but so far, I'm
not seeing or hearing any coverage.
What's up with this? I'm about ready to drive to the capitol and go office
to office registering my displeasure with the entire place. Although, I fear
that I would end up in jail and then who would be here to milk the goats
Vicke - One really unhappy Oklahoman
Ok-sus mailing list
Ok-sus at lists.oksustainability.org
Ok-sus mailing list
Ok-sus at lists.oksustainability.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Ok-sus